This is cache of http://feeds.boingboing.net/~r/boingboing/gadgets/~3/319739248/test-lithium-aa-batt.html. Cache is the snapshot of article that we took when we index feed.
To see original page click here.
We are not affiliated with the authors of this article and not responsible for its content.
Test: Lithium AA batteries are a better deal than cheap alkalines
2008-06-25 14:02:25 by Rob Beschizza in Boing Boing Gadgets
 
800px-Limetal.JPG.jpgProblem 1: they all look alike. Problem 2: the metric most often offered as a performance indicator (mA) is hype, like megapixels and megahertz. Problem 3: the quality of the charger makes a big difference for rechargeable models. Popular Photography dumped $200 worth of AA batteries on tester Zach Honig's desk, resulting in a roundup of what's really worth buying.

The big surprise is that expensive lithium disposables are a much better deal than cheap alkalines. They lasted seven times longer in a digicam, resulting in shots that cost .16 of a cent instead of .28 of a cent.

He also likes the 15-minute chargers for rechargeable models; others, however, say these kill the batteries quicker than slow burners.

Results [Pop Photo via Gadget Lab]


 
 
 
 
 
 
TOP SEARCH
Expand / MinimizeClose Widget
  •  
RECENT SEARCH
Expand / Minimize
  •  
RELATED VIDEO
Expand / Minimize